Check out these headlines

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  October 19th, 2007
From Samuel Anthony Ettaro, RTR Media
http://www.restoretherepublic.com


NEW HAMPSHIRE RFID STUDY COMMISSION 
SEES CHIPPING KIDS AND CORPSES AS 
ACCEPTABLE
Dr. Katherine Albrecht argued for implant restrictions, but was 
overridden by industry.

CONCORD , NH :   The NEW HAMPSHIRE RFID STUDY 
COMMISSION yesterday voted in support of language that 
would allow guardians and parents to implant RFID microchips 
into children.  The Study Commission was created when the 
state Senate killed a bill which would have required labeling on 
all products containing RFID-tagged products in NH and is 
comprised of lawmakers, industry and retail representatives, 
as well as members of the public and state law enforcement 
officials.

Dr. Katherine Albrecht, who will be speaking on RFID at the 
Hope for America Conference in Tempe , AZ on December 
8th [conference site- http://www.rtrlive.com], was appointed 
to the Commission by the governor of NH to represent consumer 
interests.  This group meets once per month and one of its 
tasks is to provide recommendations to the state legislature 
including recommendations on possible legislation.

In the Oct 17th meeting in Concord , NH several aspects of 
proposed legislation were debated and several important votes 
were taken.

In this marathon meeting spanning three and a half hour long 
meeting the commission voted to remove specific language in 
proposed legislation submitted by Rep. Neal Kurk, which 
was designed to raise the bar on the microchipping of humans.  
In a 9-5 vote, the committee voted to strike down language 
requiring that anyone receiving a human implant must be at 
least eighteen years of age and eliminated language that would 
have required an individual's own personal consent to receive 
a microchip in their body.

The original text of Rep. Kurk's legislation read, "Consent 
of a guardian, guardian ad litem, attorney-in-fact, parent or other 
agent shall not be considered adequate consent."

The new language proposed by industry representative Richard 
Varn removed the words "shall not" and replaced them with 
"shall".

In addition the Commission struck out an entire provision which 
would have prohibited the microchipping of corpses.    There 
was a discussion about the fact that many people have religious 
objections to receiving a microchip post-mortem and see it as 
a desecration of their body.

The committee considered allowing a provision which would 
have allowed an opt-out policy wherein all corpses would be 
potentially subject to chipping unless the individual had opted 
out while alive through some applicable directive.

Once realizing that they had the majority on that point, they 
moved to completely strike the language prohibiting corpse 
chipping altogether.  This was discussed after people 
expressed dismay that their deceased relatives had been 
chipped as part of the cleanup of hurricane Katrina.

"These votes were not surprising considering the makeup 
of the commission," said Dr. Katherine Albrecht.  "Those 
with Pro-RFID views are disproportionately represented 
on the Commission.  We should clarify that this is really 
just an advisory body, and while we will be making 
recommendations we're not responsible for enacting 
public policy.  Although it seems obvious that the deck 
is stacked on the Commission in favor of industry, there 
is still a chance to get the type of bill that we want once 
this goes out to our legislature."

#   #   # 

Sent from:
Restore The Republic 
4 E. Ogden Ave Suite 126 Westmont, IL 60559 
__________________________________________

 


  

  The  
  United States 
  Constitution 
  

 

          
        Jesus Christ 

 

The Bill of Rights

Declaration of
Independence

 

You will not see this heart-stopping photo on the front
page of the NY Times or as the lead story of the major news networks. 
 









I predict this stunt will be the nail in the coffin of
any guest-worker/amnesty plan on the table in Washington . The image of
the American flag subsumed to another and turned upside down on American
soil is already spreading on Internet forum s and via e-mail.

Pass this along to every American citizen in your
address books and to every representative in the state and federal
government. If you choose to remain uninvolved, do not be amazed when
you no longer have a nation to call your own nor anything you have
worked for left since it will be "redistributed" to the activists while
you are so peacefully staying out of the "fray". Check history, it is
full of nations/empires that disappeared when its citizens no longer
held their core beliefs and values. One person CAN make a difference.
One plus one plus one plus one plus one plus one....... .

The battle for our secure borders and immigration laws
that actually mean something, however, hasn't even begun.

If this ticks YOU off...PASS IT ON!

 
 

Attorney Tommy Cryer Beats the IRS in court; Jury says not guilty!

Press Release

Shreveport, Louisiana , July 11, 2007, Louisiana

By: Peymon, President of Freedom Law School

www.livefreenow.org (760) 868-4271

Today a Louisiana Federal Jury found Attorney Tommy Cryer NOT GUILTY of 2 counts of willful failure to file an income tax return. Earlier on Monday July 9th the Government had on its own motion dismissed 2 counts of tax evasion charges that it had charged Tommy Cryer with. 2 Years ago, another Federal Jury in California had dealt a serious blow to the IRS’ image of invincibility by finding former IRS special Agent Criminal Investigator Joseph Banister not guilty of several tax charges. Banister’s victory was reported in the July 11, 2005 issue of the American Free Press at www.americanfreepress.net/html/famed_irs_whistleblower.html.

Tommy explained to the jury that his study of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the IRS Code and Regulations convinced Tommy that he was not an individual who was required to file and pay the Federal Income Tax, despite the fact that Tommy made a living as an attorney. The Government lawyer never offered any Supreme Court decisions, IRS Code or Regulations to refute the Supreme Court decisions, the IRS Code and Regulations that Tommy Cryer had relied on to conclude that Tommy Cryer was NOT required to file an income tax return.

Tommy Cryer’s instant victory over the IRS is another serious blow to the IRS’ façade of invincibility and exposes the Wizard of Oz nature of the IRS. For more details on what took place at Tommy Cryer’s trial, go to www.traillogs.com For a more detailed report on Tommy Cryer’s win, read an upcoming issue of American Free Press on www.americanfreepress.net.

________________________________

 

 

January 20, 2006

The Wait Is Almost Over
 

Decision Expected Before GML 2007

Within months, in all probability just before the Easter break, the hot topic of the day in every single law school in America will be the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in our case entitled, We The People v. The U.S. Government. 

Given the enormous and far-reaching implications of this decision, either in favor of the People or against them, law school professors everywhere will be anxious to analyze and “mine” the decision, discussing it in their faculty and academic forums and bringing it the attention of the young minds that fill their classrooms. Many will likely rush to further explore the gravity of the ruling and publish articles in Law Review journals.  

It will be an exciting time, indeed -- especially for the ordinary non-aligned citizen taxpayers of this great Country. 

The excitement will permeate Give Me Liberty 2007, our three-day conference scheduled for March 29-31.  

Think about it. For the first time in the entire history of our nation -- since the adoption of our Bill of Rights in 1791-- a Court is about to declare the legal meaning of one of the five individual Rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. 

Not just any Right, but the mother of all Rights -- the Right that caps all the others, the so-called “Capstone Right.”

The First Amendment is, undoubtedly, the most important sentence in the entire Constitution. It reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the Right of the People peaceably to assemble, and to Petition the government for a Redress of Grievances.”  

Within the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment is the Right of each individual (and the minority) to hold government accountable to each and every provision of the Constitution, including all the other enumerated and un-enumerated Rights. This is why the Petition Clause is called the “Capstone Right.”  

What good would it do to design and adopt a Constitution based on popular sovereignty that guaranteed individual, un-alienable Rights, if the individual himself had not the power to prevent the Government from violating those Rights, non-violently?  

Given the historical evidentiary documentation regarding the Right of Petition and the common sense design of our Constitution, we believe the Court has no choice but to declare that when the Government violates the Constitution, the People have the Right to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances, the Government has an obligation to respond to the Petitions, and the People have the Right to withdraw their financial support from the Government until their Grievances are Redressed.  

With accountability in government restored as more People claim and exercise this profound reborn Right, the unsound, cracked, flawed, shaky, rickety checks and balances of today’s system of governance will become a thing of the past -- topics for the constitutional historians of tomorrow.

There will be an enormous shift in the balance of political power, with the ultimate power coming to rest once again with the People, where it was meant to be in the first place -- decreed by Divine Providence. Constitutional governance will once again be carried out in decency and good order, faithful to the purposes it was originally intended, including the preservation, protection and enhancement of individual Liberty. 

Given the degree of craziness that currently rules our Republic, the Court’s coming decision is just what the doctor ordered. 

We now have cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression, and where once we had the freedom to object, to think and speak as we saw fit, we now have censors, sensors and surveillance, coercing our conformity and soliciting our submission.  

We now have a government that commits us to perpetual un-declared wars. This in spite of the war powers clauses of the Constitution. 

The Government now forces every one of us -- every working man, woman and child -- to work for the Government, a Government that takes more than half of what you earn BEFORE you can go to the grocery store, pay your utility bills or even pay the rent.  This, in spite of the tax clauses of the Constitution. 

The Government has debased our economy, first by turning control of our currency over to a cartel of private banks – the Federal Reserve System – and then systematically converting us from a debt-free nation to the world’s greatest debtor nation, with no possibility of ever paying down the principal on the debt, BUT taxing our labor to pay the interest to the cartel on trillions of dollars of public debt. Any reasonable person would call it slavery. This, in spite of the money clauses of the Constitution. 

The Government, as a thief in the night, has snatched our privacy as it slowly converts America to a Police State, with national ID cards, domestic wiretapping, spy chips and database systems to track our purchases, money, travels and property; warrant-less wiretaps; secret searches of our homes; and secret examinations of our mail. This in spite of the privacy clauses of the Constitution. 

The Government has become despotic and tyrannical, doing whatever it wants, treating persons taken in anti-terror campaigns in inhumane and un-constitutional ways, establishing secret prisons run by the CIA, sanctioning interrogations that are, by any definition torture. This, in spite of the due process and no cruel and unusual punishment clauses of the Constitution. 

The Government ignores our immigration laws. This is spite of the Faithfully Execute clause of the Constitution. 

The Government bans cameras in our courtroom depriving the vast public the ability to monitor and systemically review the workings of the Judiciary. This, in spite of the Public Trial clause of the Constitution.

The Government prevents defendants in tax trial from defending themselves by preventing the jurors from seeing the defendant’s evidence and hearing the defendant’s witnesses. This is spite of the Due Process and Fair Trial provisions of our Constitution.  

Despite the explicit, prohibitory text of the Second Amendment, the government has sought to disarm the populace by requiring the registration and strict control of all firearms and by prohibiting well-regulated state militias. 

Even in the most personal matters of choice involving health care, the tentacles of the government reach out to regulate, monitor and control.  

How did this happen? Who’s to blame? 

For the whole Story Click Here

---------------------------------------

1040 Checkmate?

DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution 
- With Prejudice -
After PRA Defense Raised

Evidence OMB Complicit In Income Tax Fraud

DOJ & IRS Petitioned For Explanation

On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.

The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence's defense attorney Oscar Stilley.

The tactic threatened exposure of IRS's on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.

Stilley's tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form, and three felony counts of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.

The trial was to have started on Monday morning, May 15th.

On Wednesday, May 10, Stilley mailed a set of documents to the DOJ in response to DOJ's discovery demands. The documents revealed to DOJ for the first time that Lawrence was basing his entire defense on an act of Congress, 44 U.S.C. 3500 “ 3520, also known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act" (PRA).

In Section 3512 of the Act, titled "Public Protection," it says that no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with an agency's collection of information request (such as a 1040 form), if the request does not display a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Act, or if the agency fails to inform the person who is to respond to the collection of information that he is not required to respond to the collection of information request unless it displays a valid control number.

In Section 3512 Congress went on to authorize that the protection provided by Section 3512 may be raised in the form of a complete defense at any time during an agency's administrative process (such as an IRS Tax Court or Collection and Due Process Hearing) or during a judicial proceeding (such as Lawrence's criminal trial).

In sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection forms that the public is requested to file. Lawrence's sole defense was he was not required to file an IRS Form 1040 because it displays an invalid OMB control number.

Government officials knew that if the case went to trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying constitutional tort -- that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax on the labor of every working man, women and child in America.

Any information collection form, such as IRS Form 1040, which lacks bona fide statutory authority or which conflicts with the Constitution, cannot be issued an OMB control number. If a control number were issued for such a form, the form would be invalid and of no force and effect.

Under the facts and circumstances of the last 24 years, it is safe to say that IRS Form 1040 is a fraudulent, counterfeit, bootleg form. Government officials responsible for this fraud should be investigated and face indictment for willfully making and sponsoring false instruments.

Caught between a rock and a hard place, the DOJ and IRS decided not to let the Lawrence case proceed because it would reveal one critical and damning fact:

The PRA law protects those that fail to file IRS bootleg Form 1040

READ the full article with links to the court documents at www.givemeliberty.org

 (continued...)

Click Here To Access The Full Update

and to Read Schulz's Petition to the IRS, DOJ and OMB & to see the evidence that forced DOJ to dismiss the case

 

 


From the American Free Press Jan 2 & 9 2006

The American Free Press is a must have news paper for Patriots. We recommend that to subscribe to this paper. America's last real news paper.   http://www.americanfreepress.net 

_________________________________________

 

TELL YOUR SHERIFF: NO ENFORCEMENT OF SO-CALLED "PATRIOT" ACT
 
 By: Devvy
 
 March 22, 2006
 
 NewsWithViews.com
 
 Americans who are not in a self imposed coma are aware that Congress
 has once again shredded the Fourth and Fifth Amendments with their
 recent vote to extend certain provisions of the un-Patriot Act.  The
 only problem is, the Constitution must be amended, not changed,
 altered or nullified depending on the vicissitudes dictated by
 political corruption.  The day following the vote I watched Judge
 Andrew Napolitano attempt to explain to that silly fop on FOX News,
 Shepard Smith, what Congress in fact did with this latest shot at
 The Constitution.  Here's what the feds think they're going to get
 away with; this is a verbatim transcript from the aforementioned
 Segment:
 
 "Napolitano: Well, I have learned that the Patriot Act, in the name
 of fighting terrorism, allows agents to do things that we've never
 allowed them to do in the history of the United States.
 
 "Smith: For instance?
 
 "Napolitano: For instance, to read our mail without us knowing it
 and without getting a search warrant.  They can go to the post
 office, they can write their own search warrant and require the post
 office to give them your mail......
 
 "Smith: .....without a judge....
 
 "Napolitano: Without a judge involved at all.  They can go to your
 bank, your lawyer, your doctor, your accountant, your computer
 server, your telephone company, again (his emphasis) without a
 search warrant from a judge, but with their own, self hand written
 Search warrant and require those people, who keep confidential
 Information on all Americans, to turn that over.  You may say,
 'Well, my doctor would call me, my banker would call me.'
 
 "Well....no.  They will tell the person to whom they're giving the
 self written search warrant it's a felony for them to speak to
 anyone about it.  They can't tell their spouse, they can't tell
 their lawyer.  They can't even tell a Federal Judge in a Federal
 Judge's courtroom that they have been the recipient of one of these
 search warrants.  That, of course, prevents them from challenging it
 for a year.  We are not accustomed in this country to having that
 kind of power in the hands of federal agents.
 
 "We have always put a neutral judge between the government agent and
 the target of that agent.  The Patriot Act changes that.
 
 "Smith: And they can break into your house?
 
 "Napolitano: The Patriot Act, with a search warrant, allows Federal
 agents to break into your house, make it look like a burglary, steal
 your checkbook and leave and they don't have to tell you about it
 for a year.  Now, you may say, well, why?
 
 "Smith: They would only do that for terrorism, though.  Isn't that
 what they're supposed to do?
 
 Napolitano: That's what they're supposed to do, however, they have
 used this power to fight organized crime, drug dealing, pornography
 and political corruption.  The last in the city of Las Vegas.
 
"Smith: But surely they've gotten some terrorist convictions out of
 this?
 
 "Napolitano: They've gotten no terrorist convictions out of any of
 this.....
 
 "Smith: None?
 
 "Napolitano: ...evidence they've obtained out of the Patriot Act.
 Zero, never.  They've gotten a series of guilty pleas, they've
 gotten convictions on these other crimes......
 
 "Smith: But not on terror?
 
 "Napolitano: But not on terror.  They have done their best to keep
 evidence obtained under the Patriot Act from being introduced into
 Federal court because they don't want a Federal Judge to find the
 Patriot Act unconstitutional.  Now, five Federal Judges have ruled
 on it so far, two appointed by President George H.W.  Bush.  All
 five have found it unconstitutional.  They've found the self written
 search warrant aspect unconstitutional.  They found the part that
 says 'thou shall not speak' unconstitutional.  It violates the first
 amendment.
 
 "But the Justice Department keeps enforcing it and the Congress has
 just made it stronger, made it more difficult for people targeted
 under the Patriot Act, whether it's acts of terror or whatever
 (Comment: Yeah, too bad if you fall under that 'whatever' category)
 to challenge the government's behavior.
 
 "Smith: What's the fear?
 
 "Napolitano: The fear is that Government Agents, without the
 restraint of a judge, will have too much power and will violate the
 rights that the Constitution guarantees us.  Remember, we wrote the
 4th Amendment because British soldiers had the right to write their
 own search warrants, we didn't want any of that.  200 years later
 we're back where we started.
 
 "Smith: Will this be found unconstitutional?
 
 "Napolitano: I think it will.  All five judges who have looked at it
 so far have done so and I think as it makes its way through the
 appellate system, it will be found unconstitutional as well.  Now,
 the president has argued that it will only be used against the bad
 guys, it will only be used against terrorists that are so
 sophisticated that we needed to respond with this sophistication.
 We need to give law enforcement more breathing room, more elbow room
 when attacking them.
 
 "That remains to be seen.  Law enforcement has not, as we talked
 earlier, used this just to attack terrorism, they've used it all
 over.  (Comment: 'They've used it all over meaning they can search
 anything, anytime they want, nothing to do with terrorism) Because,
 quite frankly, it makes their job a lot easier.  If they don't have
 to run to a judge to get a search warrant, they can write their own
 search warrant, they can do their job easier and quicker.  But at
 the price of our freedoms."  (End excerpt)
 
 The treachery of these people back in Washington, DC, knows no
 bounds.  They're no longer even pretending the U.S.  Constitution
 exists.  It came as no surprise that Mr. Bush signed this
 unconstitutional bilge into "law."  It matters not to him or
 Congress that more than 440 cities, towns and municipalities
 rejected the first un-Patriot Act and refused to enforce certain
 provisions found to be contrary to the supreme law of the land.
 Just because these crooks, cowards, criminals and in some cases,
 functionally illiterate members of Congress or your state
 legislature pass some bill into law, doesn't make it constitutional
 or lawful.
 
 Earlier this week I sent a letter to Sheriff Lou Blanas here in
 Sacramento County with a copy to my state assemblyman, state senator
 and Da Govn'r, His Excellency, Arnold Hollywood.  I enclosed the
 above segment from FOX News.  This is the essence of that
 correspondence:
 
 1.  Not since the British occupied this country have we seen such a
 gutting of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S.
 Constitution.  Under the pretext of Bush's phony "war on terrorism,"
 Congress is simply running amok, passing legislation that is
 contrary to the supreme law of the land and this must be stopped by
 the states and county sheriffs.
 
 2.  As Sheriff for Sacramento County, you have not bben given any
 lawful authority to allow the feds to nullify my Fourth and Fifth
 Amendment RIGHTS, not to mention the Ninth and Tenth.  You work for
 we the people who elected you.  I also provided him with an
 excellent overview of the Sheriff Dave Mattis episode in Big Horn
 County, Wyoming.  This excellent and short commentary is by former
 Sheriff Richard Mack, a friend and champion of the Bill of Rights;
 it can be found here.  I wanted Blanas to see the opinion of another
 former Sheriff.
 
 3.  I provided Sheriff Blanas with a copy of the NH rejection of the
 National ID.  This was to inform him - since there is no coverage by
 "mainstream" or even cable networks - that the legislators in the
 State of New Hampshire recognize that Congress has once again over
 stepped their legislative boundaries.
 
 4.  I politely reminded Sheriff Blanas that his oath of office is to
 preserve, protect and defend both the state and U.S.  Constitution
 and that the un-Patriot Act is in obvious violation of both.
 
 5.  I concluded my correspondence with Sheriff Blanas by providing
 him with the contact information for constitutional scholars,
 Professor Jonathan Turley and Dr.  Edwin Vieira.  I encouraged him
 to consult with them and to coordinate with the legislature and His
 Excellency, Govn'r Arnie about not enforcing these unconstitutional
 provisions of the Patriot Act.
 
 I know everyone is tired, worn out and would rather relax.  It seems
 like there are so many fires about to consume us, well, too many
 feel overwhelmed and do nothing.  Have you ever read the words to
 'Impossible Dream' from Man from LaMancha?  You can here.  They are
 truly inspiring because that's what we have to do no matter how
 difficult, how hopeless or how futile our battle seems because our
 cause is a noble one.  It is imperative that every Sheriff in this
 country, the state legislatures, governors and Congress see that
 there is a wall of resistance out there and that we will NOT back
 down.  They won't know how big or how strong this resistance is
 unless we bury them with snail mail and stand at important rallies
 as I am today in Los Angeles.
 
 Two hundred thirty one years ago today, Patrick Henry, gave his
 "Give me liberty or give me death speech."  In that speech, he said:
 "Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss."  Do not be
 deceived by slick words from slick politicians.  The Patriot Act and
 the insidious Department of Homeland Security must go and we will
 settle for nothing less.  We the people will not sit by idly while
 federal agents break into our homes or snoop through our mail under
 the pretext of a "war on terrorism" that was birthed on lies and
 deceit.  Let your sheriff and lawmakers know today (or get it done
 this weekend) that you will stand up for your God given rights.
 
 "Our own Country's Honor, all call upon us for a vigorous and manly
 exertion, and if we now shamefully fail, we shall become infamous to
 the whole world.  Let us therefore rely upon the goodness of the
 Cause, and the aid of the supreme Being, in whose hands Victory is,
 to animate and encourage us to great and noble Actions - The Eyes of
 all our Countrymen are now upon us, and we shall have their
 blessings, and praises, if happily we are the instruments of saving
 them from the Tyranny mediated against them.  Let us therefore
 animate and encourage each other, and show the whole world, that a
 Freeman contending for Liberty on his own ground is superior to any
 slavish mercenary on earth."  George Washington, General Orders,
 July 2, 1776.
 
  2006 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
 
 
 
 
 Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind
 Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies.  Devvy appears on
 radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly
 sought after public speaker.  Your complimentary copy of the 32-page
 report may be obtained from El Dorado Gold.  Devvy is a contributing
 writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.
 
 Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
 
 E-mail is: devvyk@earthlin
___________________________________________________

 

Power of government


Written by Peter Macdonald 465 Packersfalls rd Lee NH 03824
603-659-6217 Print my name, address and phone #


 President Bush stated that “he would not place our military in harms way if he did not believe there was a chance of winning the war”.  This is the man whom used his fathers political pull when it was his turn to go to Vietnam.  Was not Vietnam a conflict where Politicians (who never served) risked our lives because there was a chance of victory.   May be Bush should live in the sub-human conditions of the men he so carelessly destroys.  I remember the explosions, heat, bad food, deplorable condition, death and much more in the daily life of the military deployed.
 I have total amnesia from one of my three injuries that I received during my tour.  I have no memory of life prior to my existence in the Marine Corps.  I did my 31 month tour over seas with no memory of round eye country.  I thought the deplorable living conditions of a Marines life was the norm.  Two more separate injuries left me 120% rated service connected disabled United States Marine before my discharge in 1974.
 I adjusted to life back here in the world.  I learned helping others was my way of giving to those that never came back.  Every day I am thank full for my life.  I am thank full that there is a place like the United States.  A place where the people’s rights are superior to the power of the government.  My disabilities may not be obvious to the public but I deal each day with them.  Imagine what it is like to not know how to respond to or understand everyday situations.  I have a memory that only works some of the time.  I can remember some things for ever and other things I forget in seconds.  I am adjusting.
 I volunteer to help a (strangers) Madbury NH family to expose the Madbury government that publicly stated they are using their government powers for personal revenge.  They did not deny this act under oath.  The courts violate the Constitution 29 times to cover up these criminal acts.  I am ordered by the NH Governor to stop helping this family.  I continue so the governor declares that I am a terrorist under the Patriot Act.  I am sent to jail.  I loose my freedom for 6 months. To stop the public from learning the facts the charges are dropped 4 days before the trial.  When I continue to help this family the governor informs the Veterans Hospital that I am a terrorist to get my VA medial benefits stopped.  To destroy a veterans health to shut him up is a crime.  I wrote a letter to ask why.  I lost my freedom again, was fined and given two years probation.  On Dec 05 the NH State Police go to my wife’s work place in uniform to scare her to get me to stop.  In Jan 06 State trooper Twynner calls me from the Governors office to scare me.  The President and every other government official refuses to expose these crimes.  It would not be to their political advantage my state senators and congressmen told me.  They never served either.  The president will risk our military as he states “for his “legacy ”, but he refuses to help an America citizen expose government crimes. 
 Has the courts and government taken to much power?  Do we the people take action to stop these rich, criminals that never served in our military?  What action do we take to stop their destruction to our country?  Why are so many Americas scared of the power of the government officials?  Is violence necessary to protect “We the People” Governor Lynch refuses to talk to me because the government has purposely destroyed my character in the public eye.  The newspapers believe that I am a terrorist so they refuse to print my letters.  Is this what the United States was created for? Peter Macdonald Sgt. USMC “Semper Fi” 465 Packersfalls rd Lee NH 03824 603-659-6217

_________________________________________

Judicial Complaint by Peter Macdonald
This document was filed with the United States courts. I take full responsibility for any thing said in it. It is all true. You may print my name address and phone #
e-mail the governor of NH governorlynch@nh.gov 
Peter Macdonald 465 Packersfalls rd Lee NH 03824 603-659-6217


Judicial Council
Of the First Circuit
February 12, 2006 Peter Macdonald 465 Packersfalls rd Lee NH 03824 603-659-6217

Complaint No 420 U. S. court of appeals NO 05-1433
Chief Circuit Judge Boudin
Petition for review

Now Comes; Peter Macdonald and so clearly states, when a United States natural born citizen files discrimination and other constitutional complaints against sitting judges (whom took an oath to “Protect the character of brothers members of the American Bar Association” that these so mentioned judges did knowingly with intent to cause harm violate the United States Constitution and the New Hampshire Constitution) this complaint must be heard by an impartial jury. NH Const. Part First Art. 35 “It is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual” “It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit”

Full Document 

 

________________________________________

The mark of the beast
Henry Lamb

Posted: January 7, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
The federal government is launching a National Animal Identification System that will, by 2009, require that every agricultural animal in the nation be equipped with an identification device through which its movement can be traced from birth to slaughter. At the moment, the program is voluntary; by 2009, non-compliance can result in fines of up to $1,000 per day. 

Implementation is coming fast. By April, 2006, 25 percent of all "premises" (any location where animals are kept) are to be registered with the government. By July, an Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection system is to be in place in every state. By January 2008, all premises and all animals are to be registered. By July, 2008, the movement of all animals will be tracked. In January, 2009, the program becomes mandatory.

The stated purpose of the program is to enable government to trace, within 48 hours, the source of a faulty animal food product. The effect of the program is the transfer of the control of private property to the government – while forcing the property owner to pay the cost of the transfer.
Last week's column asked: "What do you call it when government takes away the use of private property, but leaves the title in the name of the property owner?" Dozens of letter writers correctly responded: "Fascism." Last week's column was about government controlling the use of land; this week, the government is controlling the use of animals.
The program is not limited to commercial producers; it includes the half-dozen chickens at grandma's house. Her "premises" and each chicken must be registered with the government as the program now stands. In fact, the pet parakeet in a cage on the 20th floor of a condo in Miami Beach must also be registered, along with the premises. As the program now stands, there are no exceptions.
Surely some of the stupidity will be squeezed out of the program as more people become aware of it and insist that government has gone too far. The question, however, is not how far is too far, but whether government should go there at all.
Nothing among the enumerated powers granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution can be construed to include the power to control the use of private property. The federal government is empowered to regulate interstate commerce, but grandma's chickens and aunt Jane's parakeet do not constitute interstate commerce.
Everyone wants a safe, abundant and affordable food supply, which America has enjoyed for years – without a National Animal Identification System. Why is it necessary now? The increased terrorist threat certainly justifies tightening up security in the food chain. But the NAIS does little or nothing to tighten security, while imposing ridiculous burdens upon the small producer.
The NAIS was initiated by the National Institute of Animal Agriculture, a non-government organization consisting of the leaders of agribusiness. The program they designed tends to shift the burden, cost and ultimate responsibility for food safety from the agribusiness giants to the small producer.
Interstate commerce conjures up images of businesses such as Tyson Foods, which has mastered the art of vertically integrated marketing. Tyson controls the production of its chickens from birth to market, using farmers only to provide space and labor to get their product to slaughter. Here is where government should focus its regulatory concern – and leave grandma's chickens alone.
Suppliers of beef, pork and lamb, often buy their animals from small producers who work hard to raise healthy, marketable animals. The agribusiness suppliers are free to buy, or not buy, from any producer. Here, at the point where the product enters the food chain, is where responsibility, security and regulatory control should be focused – not on the already overburdened small producer.
But no. The NAIS requires the small producer to not only bear the cost of the program, but also to be the ultimate scapegoat in the event that an agribusiness supplier's product is found to be faulty, for whatever reason. Should little Johnny get sick after eating a hamburger made with beef supplied by BigAgri Packing Company, BigAgri simply points the finger to the producer, or producers, whose cows were in the batch from which Johnny's hamburger was made. Agribusiness shifts its responsibility for buying only healthy product to the farmer, who must guarantee his animals to be healthy.
The NAIS is an industry-designed program which will drive small producers out of business, reduce competition and ultimately put both supply and price in the hands of industry giants – unless opponents of this program get organized.

 

This song is dedicated to (the so called)
Judge Kent Dawson

http://victimsoflaw.net/judicialnews.htm
________________________________

Congress leaves tax issue hanging
The Alternative Minimum Tax, meant to close loopholes
for the rich, could wallop some middle-class taxpayers
David Westphal, News & Observer Washington Bureau

As many as 17 million Americans will begin the
new year facing the possibility of sharply higher
federal income taxes in 2006.
http://www.newsobserver.com/114/story/381922.html

Nice huh?

________________________________
Comment on this story.
Readers' Viewpoints:

U.S. Supreme Court ignores intent,
letter of Constitution on religious freedom

To the Editor: It started with the assault on school prayer.
Since then there have been battles with the American Civil
Liberties Union and secular radicals over anything and
everything Godly and Christian. The current battlegrounds
including taking of God out of the Pledge of Allegiance and
removing “In God We Trust” from our money. Now even
Christmas is under attack.
 
What is so interesting about this assault on Christianity is
that it is clearly unconstitutional. The phrase “separation of
church and state” is not in the Constitution.
http://www.timesreporter.com/left.php?ID=49082

________________________________

The Great Beast Fest

Be prepared for the coming RFID revolution!

RFID promises to revolutionize supply chains and usher in
a new era of cost savings, efficiency and business intelligence.
the business case for RFID, regulation & standards and
challenges in implementing and integrating the technology.
http://www.rfidsummit.ie/
 
________________________________

 

Sympathy for Mr. Cheney

To prepare for this article:
http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html
by F. Tupper Saussy

Now that Michael Ruppert (www.fromthewilderness.com)
has shown that the whole 9/11 attack on America was
masterminded and overseen by Dick Cheney, I suppose
the Vice-President is preparing an apologist to take the
heat. Of course, the media gateways will do everything in
their power to prevent the public's being as informed as
Mr. Ruppert, but thanks to the internet, people are being
brought up to speed very quickly.
 
continue here http://tuppersaussy.com/html/writings/articles/cheney.html
 
_________________________________________

 

Spying on the US Security State. Countermeasures for US Citizens
12/27/2005 10:45
 
Is anyone really surprised that the USA now openly advocates torture, spying on its own citizens, or equates dissent with aiding and abetting  the "brutal killers" as Bush describes them?
Whew! Life is imitating art. President Bush stars as Sgt. Bob Barnes,  the maniacal soldier in Oliver Stone's Platoon, who proclaims that he "is reality". Vice President Cheney is Dr. Phibes as portrayed by Vincent Price in the movie classic, The Abominable Doctor Phibes. You want torture? Talk to Dr. Phibes. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld brings  to life Colonel Walt Kurtz, the rogue US Army soldier from Francis Ford  Coppola's Apocalypse Now. American society is modeled on Starship Troopers' militarized society at war with the insects from another galaxy. A great scene in Troopers is a segment which shows children  stamping out bugs with glee as the narrator says, "Support the war  effort. Do your part to kill the bug!" Welcome to the USA.
Is anyone really surprised that the USA now openly advocates torture, spying on its own citizens, or equates dissent with aiding and abetting  the "brutal killers" as Bush describes them? Ummm, should US homegrown serial killers be designated enemy combatants? Who could argue with a clear conscience that the US didn't have 911 coming. Civilians are  innocent, the American fundamentalists say. Oh me, oh my, the victimized USA and so much innocence lost on that day. That sentimental dream went out the window long ago with the Allied bombing of Dresden in  WWII and the fire-bombing and subsequent use of nuclear weapons against Japan. Add Rwanda and Darfur to that and, right at home, add decades of US government approved racial segregation, plus the US government's response to Katrina and, for that matter, 911.  Useless commissions, staged congressional hearings, senseless senses of congress, a presidential press conference. All by formula, of course. What's the point? Nothing changes.Patriotism
The USA is no victim or innocent bystander in the world's machinations. Each and every US citizen is responsible for the actions of its leaders--such as they are. If the American people want a militarized  state, then so be it. Have some brass and go for it. If they want to  torture, then they should have the guts to stick a knife in the throat of a living human being and watch'em gurgle and die. The NO TORTURE amendment of John McCain is a joke. The US government is a government by and for loopholes. It'll go on as long as the USA exists.
Of Mice and Evil Doers
Why limit the game to waterboarding or electric shock? Use the Spanish  Inquisition era Mouse Trap. Put a bunch of mice into an open metal container and then secure it and them on the abdomen of the evil doer/dissenter. Slowly apply heat to the metal. Mice burrow when they  can't run. Use your imagination. The "Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave." What nonsense!  Special operators are brave, some journalists and citizens are brave, fire fighters and first responders are brave, but most Americans are from the Land of the Cowardly.
The overthrown regimes, the assassinations, the support for murderous regimes, silencing dissidents, eliminating politicians and sanctioning the use of torture and murder of civilians the world over is the standard  mode of operations. The leaders of the USA work hard to ensure that they are not charged with war crimes or plain old violation of US law - such as it is. And the American people tolerate it. At the pace the USA is pissing off the rest of the world, expect more 911's.
We have to, in all seriousness, thank Bush and his crew for speaking bluntly about  what has been known for so long by so few, but never really exposed. Yes, Americans, your leaders authorize torture, domestic spying, and  are adept at creating threats that lead to wars. After all, it's good for business and anyway, how would "you", White Collar Proletariat, know what it takes to keep the gas pumps in operation or what threats are out there. Since most Americans are, as President Nixon once said, "children",  they'll do what they are told.
And the President's toys are the US military. There are 18,000 warfighters, those Americans killed, maimed, and mentally demolished in the ongoing Iraq War. And for what? The Shia and Kurds have their day in the historic election in Iraq that puts orthodox Islam in charge and creates a Kurdish state. Good for them. Now the USA cries foul over the election as if it has any democratic authority to do so. Protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States is the military's gig. Yet the high flying generals seem to want to protect individual players rather than the country.
Exceeding the Speed Limit Becomes Terrorism
For a time, US citizens were spared the ruthlessness of the USA's actions abroad primarily because the government and its corporate partners could control the images, the stories, the facts from reaching Americans. Recognizing they've lost that ability, the PATRIOT ACT is a sort of government-corporate last ditch effort to retain control over information flows. Now the security police can whip up a file on you containing credit ratings, health records, spending patterns, reading preferences, travel destinations and even sexual preferences. All you have to do to get tha honor is to get on a watch list by asking a hypothetical question like this, Is there any other way to change the US government-corporate system other than by  overthrowing it? Perhaps one day an innovative lawyer will argue that elements of the US government, and its contractors, are engaging in terrorist activity contrary to the PATRIOT ACT. Now wouldn't that be interesting.
Every state in the union has its own version of the PATRIOT ACT and  has empowered their own state and local law enforcement departments with "the tools to fight the terror." The day is not far off when speeding will be a terrorist act because it endangers other drivers, pedestrians, and national security, the latter due to the crime of excess fuel usage that could've been used in the War on those insect-like evil doers.
"Forget about it", as Donnie Brasco from the movie of the same name would say. The New York Times or Washington Post report on the NSA/Pentagon's extensive domestic spy network is shocking? And  Congress? With its unwillingness to perform its oversight function, departments like Defense, Homeland Security, and Justice are too big to be controlled, too powerful to be stopped from the routine violations of the US Constitution/Bill of Rights. Think about it: the US Congress has become a nuisance to the Presidency and its bureaucracy, and the judicial system. That is a fact. So just Forget About It!
Countermeasures
The first and most important countermeasure is to get off your lazy behind and become a responsible US citizen. Instead of being fed the news, hunt it down yourself. Start with foreign newspaper websites, other country news agencies and get used to the images of death and  destruction. USA. One of the best data resources is the US government's own data. The CIA Factbook is also an excellent tool. They pull no  punches on the weaknesses of each country including the USA. Want to know how many hydrophonic devices are monitoring water conditions in the Gulf of Mexico (lots of oil rigs there too), or sick of the Weather Channel? Go to www.noaa.gov and do the work yourself. Your taxes paid for it. Why let some actor feed you the weather story on TV when you can get a lot more info from those who really know about what storm is coming your way.
Want to know your odds about getting away with murder? Visit the Justice Department's website and look for statistics on homicides cleared. You'll be surprised that the odds are pretty good on the criminal side of the equation.
Check out US military unit websites like Camp Bondsteel, or the dynamite special operators' website at Hurlburt Air Force Base in  Florida. Visit Stars and Stripes. If it's military matters that  interest you, there are plenty of bits and  pieces of information that can help you paint a picture of what the civilian policy makers are up to. The US military is their tool.
Visit trade association web sites. The US government security masters don't want anyone to know where critical infrastructure is located. No  problem. If you want to know where all the nuclear power plants in the  USA are - and who owns them, visit the Nuclear Energy Institute at www.nei.org and click on Nuclear Data. While there, visit the whole site. It's very well done. And what about oil and gas pipeline maps? No problem. Visit Duke Energy at www.duke-energy.com and click on the Interactive Asset Map. Many energy companies provide asset maps as do their trade groups. If you've got cash, you can access digital maps that detail all the pipelines, hydroelectric plants and dams in the USA.
There are dozens of superb dataminers running websites that are invaluable in the effort to figure out what the US government-corporate enterprise is up to. They are the 21st Century equivalent of the American Colonist's Committees of Correspondence. There are far too many to list here but three are simply indispensable. Want to know how  a member of congress is likely to vote or the stock portfolio they have? Visit www.opensecrets.org and look at the congressperson's campaign contributions and stock holdings. Research yields some interesting results. Want to know when and where US government-corporate groups are meeting to set policy? Visit www.cryptome.org and check out the Federal Register postings.
Want to know if the media and the two party system is promoting a powerful individual as the voice of America? Take Brent Scowcroft, for example, the American Turkish Council's Board Chair (another site to visit to figure out why the US has so much invested in Turkey - www.americanturkishcouncil.org). He's the on the good side of the dark side, if there is such a thing in Star Wars. As recently reported, Scowcroft assailed the US Congress for debating the Armenian Genocide because it's bad for business which, as it happens, is national security (meanwhile the Turkish government is prosecuting its top novelist for alluding to the Armenian Genocide - so much for democracy there). Ole Brent is portrayed as such a caring fellow by the media, yet it turns out that Mr. Nice Guy was complicit with Henry Kissinger, et al, in providing support to the Indonesian government during the invasion and occupation of East Timor from 1975-1999. Thanks to the National Security Archive at www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/, the world knows that Scowcroft is as ruthless as they come.
If you really want to know about national security, join a defense association like the National Defense Industrial Association (www.ndia.org). Each year they sponsor a special operations/low intensity conflict (SO/LIC) conference, exhibition and awards dinner. Embassy officials (Intel types), DOD officials, media members and active duty US/Foreign military and their contractors show up to give the attendees the latest on SO/LIC matters. It's a most excellent production by the NDIA staff who run the event. There are dozens of presentations dealing with civil-military relations, psyops, tactics, etc. Conference proceedings can be had right off the Net.
What can't be had. though, though is  the happy hour off-the-record (OTR) conversations in the hotel lounge or the exhibition hall. The awards dinner features commendations read aloud for active special operators for their "classified" activity all over the  world (well deserved, they should be recognized). The certificate presentations sometimes tip the hat as  to where the operations have taken place.
Want to know about counterinsurgency technology? Go to www.tswg.gov.  The folks at the Technical Support Working Group hate publicity and despise those who question the US government-corporate rule of law, but they are to be respected for fielding technologies that help save the lives of the warfighters who are being sacrificed for the delusional schemes of the governing apparatus.
There are dozens of defense related associations in the DC Metro area and many have chapters nationwide and overseas - among them are: NDIA, Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA), Association of the United States Army (AUSA), The Navy League, Old  Crows, Association of Former Intelligence Officials (AFIO), and the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Association (AUVA). They all perform studies  and reports that are available on the Net or for free or a small fee.
Most have monthly publications that exclude politics providing just nuts and bolts commentary on the tradecraft. The dirty little secret  about the mainstream press is that they comb through the trade publications to get their next story on US military policy or technology. They know that the trade associations tell Congress what to think and often house former government officials or future ones. The associations have  a lot of clout and insider information.
Don't Just Sit IN Front of the CRT
Good, solid information is to be had frequenting pubs near the agency/issue you are exploring. For defense/Intel purposes, pubs near military-Intel sites are the home of raucous debate coming from greybeard warfighters to those of the present day. Respect doesn't come